THE BLOOD OF MY KINDRED

Connie Provides New Outlet for Suspicious Characters

 

Apparently Connie Chastain’s website, 180 Degrees True South, was not enough of a platform for her own style of poor history and praise of Southern Heritage that she had to develop a new Facebook page by the same name.  Here she has collected various suspicious characters who have never been afraid to show their racism when it comes to discussing the cause of the War of the Rebellion or attempting to downplay the role of slavery in the coming of the war.  She has gathered the likes of John C. Hall who recently posted the following…

“Levin is a jewish name of the tribe of the Levites….No doubt his is the typical liberal jew. Most of these types of jewish people are very liberal and see the South as a great evil. Not all are like this…I have a Jewish client from the Bronx….he loves the South and always askes me how is the war going….lol…..So consider the source…He won’t let me post  on his blog either to defend the South..the hell with him…..”

You will no doubt remember Mr. Hall from his posts over at Brooks Simpson’s Crossroads.

One of the first people to join Connie’s new site was “Mr. Secession” himself, Michael Hill who founded and runs the League of the South which is known for statements like this

“If the scenario of the South (and the rest of America) being overrun by hordes of non-white immigrants does not appeal to you, then how is this disaster to be averted? By the people who oppose it rising up against their traitorous elite masters and their misanthropic rule. But to do this we must first rid ourselves of the fear of being called ‘racists’ and the other meaningless epithets they use against us. What is really meant by the [anti-racist] advocates when they peg us as ‘racists’ is that we adhere to ethnocentrism, which is a natural affection for one’s own kind. This is both healthy and Biblical. I am not ashamed to say that I prefer my own kind and my own culture. Others can have theirs; I have mine. No group can survive for long if its members do not prefer their own over others.” — Mike Hill, Web essay

And…

“[T]he Southern League supports a return to a political and social system based on kith and kin rather than an impersonal state wedded to the idea of the universal rights of man. At its core is a European population.” — Michael Hill, essay on League of the South website, 2000″

Finally Connie is supported in her quest for poor historical analysis by Michael C. Lucas.  He does not have the racial undertones that the others do, but his understanding of history for a member of our armed forces is atrocious.  He is well known for comments on Brooks’ Crossroad and for winners like this…

 ”I am a Confederate Spartan!”

Whatever the hell that is… and one more…

“To the contrary Mr Levin, and a great many PC historians, PC Radicals, and just people who have nothing better to do have a great contempt and objective distorting facts and perpetuating hate against Confederate Americans.”

Sooner or later the “P” and the “C” are going to break on the keyboards of those who believe in this great “PC” conspiracy.

It is very obvious that Connie is surrounding herself with some very extreme people with extreme ideologies.  You can see a complete members list here.  I have refused to join her site and take part in the bullshit that is Connie Chastain’s understanding of the War of the Rebellion and history in general.  However, my hat is off to Rob Baker and Neil Hamilton  for putting up with the antics of those mentioned above.  For me, I have grown to tired of it to continue to beat my head against a wall over and over.

What Do You Think?

Update…John Cummings has posted some more pictures and thoughts on his theory.

I think anyone familiar with the Civil War knows this picture…however you may have not seen it colorized as you see above.  I think this adds a touch of realism that you just don’t get with the usual black and white.  In the recent couple of days and weeks I have noticed new claims to where this photo was actually taken.  It has been a mystery ever since William Frassanito published his book, Gettysburg: A Journey In Time.  Once I looked through this book I was hooked on the then and now pictures of the war…no matter the battlefield or place.

There have been several claims to finding the correct camera position for the series of pictures but not one has been definitive.  So in this post I have linked to as many of the claims as I can find and I look to you, my readers to give me your take on the evidence presented by the following people.

Scott HartwigHere, Here and Here

John CummingsHere…and don’t forget to read John’s excellent blog for all things Spotsy!

Jerry Coates…via Gettysburg DailyHere, Here and Here and in the first version of this story that I saw….Rendezvous at Gettysburg with Additional Photos from 1997.

There is more discussion of the Images on Military History Online….Here, Here, Here, Here and Here

If you have any more links or just want to tell me which historian has the right idea please post in the comments section.  I have a favorite theory from one of the men above, but I will keep it to myself until I get some of your feedback.  Good Luck!

Making Mountains Out of…Just About Everything!

Above you will see a video shot during the Lee-Jackson Celebration on Saturday January 14, 2012.  Approximately 360 people marched in the parade (including the Virginia Flaggers which includes now famous Southern Heritage Advocates Susan Frise Hathaway, Still Karen and Billy Bearden) and about 1500 people attended the ceremony in the cemetery at Jackson’s grave site.  This ceremony took place in Lexington, Virginia the site of a recently enacted flag ordinance that has been highly contested by Southern Heritage Advocates and the SCV’s is currently suing the city over the ordinance.  Andy Hall of Dead Confederates posted over at Civil War Memory about the Lexington flag ordinance and he points out very clearly…

The ordinance bars any flag, other than the U.S. national flag, that of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and the City of Lexington. There are lots of news stories out there that say the city banned Confederateflags, but that’s not what the ordinance actually says:

 1. Only the following flags may be flown on the flag standards affixed to light poles in the City and no others:

 a. The national flag of the United States of America (the “American flag”).

b. The flag of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Code of Virginia, Title 1, Chapter 5.

c. The City Flag of Lexington.

2. The American flag, the flag of the Commonwealth of Virginia and the City Flag of Lexington may be flown by the City on the light poles that have standards affixed to them on dates adopted by City Council. A copy of the dates for the flying of said flags is available through the City Manager’s office or the office of the director of public works. Currently the holidays or designated days are as follows: Independence Day, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Flag Day, Martin Luther King Day, Memorial Day, Lee-Jackson Day, Presidents Day, and on the day of the annual Rockbridge Community Festival. On such dates or days the flag(s) may be flown for more than one day. No other flag shall be permitted.

Nothing set forth herein is intended in any way to prohibit or curtail individuals from carrying flags in public and/or displaying them on private property.

Despite what one wants to believe, the flag ordinance does not single out and ban the rebel flag and has a pretty good chance at standing up in court.  It should be painfully obvious to even the most casual observer that the rebel flag was alive and well in the city of Lexington on January 14th.

In another strange twist, the blowhards over at Facebook’s Virginia War Between the States Sesquicentennial, a site run by Susan F. Hathaway, has posted the picture below of Billy Bearden collecting the Lexington Proclamation declaring January 14th as Lee/Jackson Day.  The question I have is why did Billy Bearden or any of the “Virginia Flaggers” have to pick up this declaration? Was it just to rub the day in the nose of the mayor who is now the target of these outsiders in her bid for re-election?  Oddly there were others who confused the flag ordinance with the Lee-Jackson celebration.  However, the celebration and day went off without a hitch, and they took lots of pictures including these which are a virtual whose-who of the Southern Heritage Advocate crowd…I will have to post on some of these pictures in a separate post.

In Their Words…

Metta Andrews- Eliza's Sister

Today we continue our look at Eliza Frances Andrews’ A Diary of a Georgia Girl.  This post will focus on Chapter I: Across Sherman’s Track, December 19-24, 1864.  Ms. Andrews begins the chapter with an explanatory note describing how she and her sister would travel to Southwest Georgia to stay the winter with her older sister…

“EXPLANATORY NOTE. – At the time of this narrative, the writer’s eldest sister, Mrs. Troup Butler, was living alone with her two little children on a plantation in Southwest Georgia, between Albany and Thomasville. Besides our father, who was sixty-two when the war began, and a little brother who was only twelve when it closed, we had no male relations out of the army, and she lived there with no other protector, for a good part of the time, than the negroes themselves. There were not over a hundred of them on the place, and though they were faithful, and nobody ever thought of being afraid on their account, it was lonely for her to be there among them with no other white person than the overseer, and so the writer and a younger sister, Metta, were usually sent to be her companions during the winter. The summers she spent with us at the old home.

But in the fall of 1864, while Sherman’s army was lying around Atlanta like a pent-up torrent ready to burst forth at any moment, my father was afraid to let us get out of his sight, and we all stood waiting in our defenseless homes till we could see what course the destroying flood would take. Happily for us it passed by without engulfing the little town of Washington, where our home was situated, and after it had swept over the capital of the State, reaching Milledgeville November 23d, rolled on toward Savannah, where the sound of merry Christmas bells was hushed by the roar of its angry waters”

I do find it interesting that despite what one hears today about the rape and pillage of southern women by Sherman’s “hordes” that these young women would travel across Georgia just after Sherman’s Army had passed.  She does comment on why their travels were delayed…

“By the middle of December, communication, though subject to many difficulties and discomforts, was so well established that my father concluded it would be practicable for us to make the journey to our sister. We were eager to go, and would be safer, he thought, when once across the line, than at home. Sherman had industriously spread the impression that his next move would be on either Charleston or Augusta, and in the latter event, our home would be in the line of danger. Southwest Georgia was at that time a “Land of Goshen” and a “city of refuge” to harassed Confederates. Thus far it had never been seriously threatened by the enemy, and was supposed to be the last spot in the Confederacy on which he would ever set foot – and this, in the end, proved to be not far from the truth.”

When they did travel, they experienced the destruction brought on by secession…

“Since the destruction of the Georgia, the Macon & Western, and the Central railroads by Sherman’s army, the whole tide of travel between the eastern and western portions of our poor little Confederacy flows across the country from Mayfield to Gordon. Mett and I, with two other ladies, whom we found on the train at Camack, were the first to venture across the gap – 65 miles of bad roads and worse conveyances, through a country devastated by the most cruel and wicked invasion of modern times.”

The narrative then describes an event that challenges some of the myths of the march. Notice how they encounter numerous soldiers who one would think would be required to be with the army and how she says that they has a royal breakfast when food was supposed to be scarce.  It is there encounter with a Confederate Colonel and his new bride, a wounded soldier, a Captain of the Texas Rangers, a lieutenant and a “handsome” young captain.  I would think that for a country on the brink of defeat they would need every able-bodied soldier from the lowest private to General Lee himself in the ranks.

“Near us sat a handsome middle-aged gentleman in the uniform of a colonel, with a pretty young girl beside him, whom we at once spotted as his bride. They were surrounded by a number of officers, and the bride greatly amused us, in the snatches of their conversation we overheard, by her extreme bookishness.”

“We had a royal breakfast, and while we were eating it, Mr. Belisle, who had spent the night at the hotel, drove up with a four-mule wagon, in which he had engaged places for us and our trunks to Milledgeville, at seventy-five dollars apiece. It was a common plantation wagon, without cover or springs, and I saw Mr. Simpson shake his head ominously as we jingled off to take up more passengers at the hotel. There were several other conveyances of the same sort, already overloaded, waiting in front of the door, and a number of travelers standing on the sidewalk rushed forward to secure places in ours as soon as we halted. The first to climb in was a poor sick soldier, of whom no pay was demanded. Next came a captain of Texas Rangers, then a young lieutenant in a shabby uniform that had evidently seen very hard service, and after him our handsome young captain of the night before.”

Very odd in deed for December of 1864 just after Sherman made his march from Atlanta to the Sea without much resistance.  I am sure there is a very good reason for this, however Eliza does not explain it to the reader.  The most interesting part of this chapter so far has to do with the killing of Yankee prisoners.

“Just beyond Sparta we were halted by one of the natives, who, instead of paying forty dollars for his passage to the agent at the hotel, like the rest of us, had walked ahead and made a private bargain with Uncle Grief, the driver, for ten dollars. This “Yankee trick” raised a laugh among our impecunious Rebs, and the lieutenant, who was just out of a Northern prison, and very short of funds, thanked him for the lesson and declared he meant to profit by it the next chance he got. The newcomer proved to be a very amusing character, and we nicknamed him “Sam Weller,” on account of his shrewdness and rough-and-ready wit. He was dressed in a coarse home-made suit, but was evidently something of a dandy, as his shirt-front sported a broad cotton rude edged with home-made cotton lace. He was a rebel soldier, he said: “Went in at the fust pop and been a-fightin’ ever since, till the Yankees caught me here, home on furlough, and wouldn’t turn me loose till I

had took their infernal oath – beg your pardon, ladies – the jig’s pretty nigh up anyway, so I don’t reckon it’ll make much diff’rence.”

        He told awful tales about the things Sherman’s robbers had done; it made my blood boil to hear them, and when the captain asked him if some of the rascals didn’t get caught themselves sometimes – stragglers and the like – he answered with a wink that said more than words:

        “Yes; our folks took lots of prisoners; more’n'll ever be heard of agin.”

        “What became of them?” asked the lieutenant.

        “Sent ‘em to Macon, double quick,” was the laconic reply. “Got ‘em thar in less’n half an hour.”

        “How did they manage it?” continued the lieutenant, in a tone that showed he understood Sam’s metaphor.

        “Just took ‘em out in the woods and lost ‘em,” he replied, in his jerky, laconic way. “Ever heerd o’ losin’men, lady?” he added, turning to me, with an air of grim waggery that made my flesh creep – for after all, even Yankees are human beings, though they don’t always behave like it.

        “Yes,” I said, “I had heard of it, but thought it a horrible thing.”

        “I don’t b’lieve in losin’ ‘em, neither, as a gener’l thing,” he went on. “I don’t think it’s right principul, and I wouldn’t loseone myself, but when I see what they have done to these people round here, I

can’t blame ‘em for losin’every devil of ‘em they kin git their hands on.”

        “What was the process of losing?” asked the captain. “Did they manage the business with fire-arms?”

        “Sometimes, when they was in a hurry,” Mr. Weller explained, with that horrible, grim irony of his, “the guns wouldgo off an’ shoot ‘em, in spite of all that our folks could do. But most giner’ly they took the grapevine road in the fust patch of woods they come to, an’ soon as ever they got sight of a tree with a grape vine on it, it’s cur’ous how skeered their hosses would git. You couldn’t keep ‘em from runnin’ away, no matter what you done, an’ they never run fur before their heads was caught in a grape vine and they would stand thar, dancin’ on nothin’ till they died. Did you ever hear of anybody dancin’ on nothin’ before, lady?” – turning to me.

        I said he ought to be ashamed to tell it; even a Yankee was entitled to protection when a prisoner of war.

        “But these fellows wasn’t regular prisoners of war, lady,” said the sick soldier; “they were thieves and houseburners,” – and I couldn’t but feel there was something in that view of it.

One has to wonder about this type of activity and how often it occured during the March and the war.

To be continued…

“I Just Wanted To Tell The Story of Paul Jennings”

A Slave in the White House (click to see video) by Elizabeth Dowling Taylor was recently featured on the Daily Show with John Stewart.  The author tells the story of one of James Madison’s slaves, Paul Jennings.  Starting at the two minute mark I think John Stewart make the author admit to what Kevin Levin was speaking to in this post where Ms. Taylor says that she just wanted to tell the story of Paul Jennings without passing judgement on Dolly and James Madison with regards to slavery. 

Great interview, infromative and funny.

Post Navigation