
I thought that since everyone down south must be in a big flurry of confederate euphoria now that it is Confederate History Month that I would allow some real confederates do the talking. Here we have Jabez Curry who was the Secession Commissioner from Alabama to Maryland. You can find the full text here.
You will notice that at no time does Curry ever address the non-slaveholding states, as if there was ever a question in his mind as to the real reason for secession-Slavery.
“as to what is best to be done to protect the rights, interests, and honor of the slave-holding States,” menaced and endangered by recent political events. Having watched with painful anxiety the growth, power, and encroachments of anti-slaveryism, and anticipating for the party held together by this sentiment of hostility to the rights and institutions of the Southern people a probable success, too fatally realized, in the recent Presidential election, the General Assembly of Alabama, on the 24th of February, 1860, adopted joint resolutions providing, on the happening of such a contingency, for a convention of the State “to consider, determine, and do whatever the rights, interests, and honor of Alabama require to be done for their protection.”
You will also see that African Slavery is a the very forefront of his thoughts.
Recognizing the common interests and destiny of all the States holding property in the labor of Africans, and “anxiously desiring their co-operation in a struggle which perils all they hold most dear,”
and…
“When Mr. Lincoln is inaugurated it will not be simply a change of administration–the installation of a new President–but a reversal of the former practice and policy of the Government, so thorough as to amount to a revolution. Cover over its offensiveness with the most artful disguises, and the fact stands out in its terrible reality that the Government, within the amplitude of its jurisdiction, real or assumed, becomes foreign to the South, and is not to recognize the right of the Southern citizen to property in the labor of African slaves.”
and again…
The minority section must have some other protection than the discretion or sense of justice of the majority, for the Constitution as interpreted, with a denial of the right of secession or State interposition, affords no security or means of redress against a hostile and fanatical majority. The action of the two committees in the Senate and House of Congress shows an unalterable purpose on the part of the Republicans to reap the fruits of their recent victory, and to abate not a jot or tittle of their Abolition principles. They refuse to recognize our rights of property in slaves, to make a division of the territory, to deprive themselves of their assumed constitutional power to abolish slavery in the Territories or District of Columbia, to increase the efficiency of the fugitive slave law, or make provision for the compensation of the owners of runaway or stolen slaves, or place in the hands of the South any protection against the rapacity of an unscrupulous majority.”
He ends his letter/speech with the following…
“It gives me pleasure to be the medium of communicating with you, and through you to the Legislature of Maryland when it shall be convened. I trust that between Maryland and Alabama, and other States having a homogeneous population, kindred interests, and an inviting future of agricultural, mining, mechanical, manufacturing, commercial, and political success, a union, strong as the tie of affection and lasting as the love of liberty, will soon be formed, which shall stand as a model of a free, representative, constitutional, voluntary republic.”
After reading this I can only wonder where neo-confederates and false historian like Tommy Dilorenzo come up with the tariff or any other neo-confederate revision.
Interesting idea behind the site.
There are a lot of American Civil War blogs out there, many of which sail close to the wind in their enthusiasm for the Confederacy.
Look forward to reading further posts in the summer…
Good blog, I’ll be looking in from time to time.
I am not American, but Irish. I have plenty of Civil war books, and am a great admirer of Lincoln, though I try to stop short of canonising him as a saint.
I decided not to waste money on any of Dilorenzo’s books … they just seemed like the work of a crank. I did see an interview with him on C-SPAN, unfortunately not by a Civil War historian so he got a free ride. But I know enough about Lincoln to realise the weakness of pinning a left-wing conspiracy theory on Old Abe.