Archive for the ‘Monuments’ Category

h1

New Lincoln Statue in Metamora, Illinois

September 3, 2009

The city of Metamora, Il. has raised the money for ($105,000 or so) and erected a new statue of Abraham Lincoln and Melissa Goings in the town square just across the street from the Metamora Court House where Lincoln practiced law on the 8th Judicial Circuit.

Here are some pictures of the new statues and the story of Melissa Goings and Abraham Lincoln.

Lincoln and Goings 1

Lincoln and Goings 2

Lincoln and Goings 3

Statues in front of the Metamora Court Houst State Historical Site

Statues in front of the Metamora Court House State Historical Site

JUSTICE SERVED

An essay: Abraham Lincoln and the Melissa Goings Case

By Jean Myers

 

Twenty-two years before the 16th President of the United States died of a gunshot to the head after restoring the Union of our broken country, a disheveled thirty-four year old self-taught country lawyer named Abraham Lincoln traveled on horseback through the prairie and wilderness between the counties that made up the Eighth Illinois Judicial Circuit Court – the four-hundred and forty mile circuit that included Hanover, later named Metamora, in Woodford County. 

Lincoln actually started riding part of the newly formed Eighth Judicial Circuit in 1837 before there was a Woodford County, (founded 1841), but by 1843, he was riding most or all of the circuit once in the spring and again in the fall of most years through 1857.  In 1842, Abraham married Mary Todd, and their first child, Robert, was born in 1843.  By that time, Lincoln was spending about five months out of the year riding the circuit.  Sons Edward (Eddie), William (Willie) and Thomas (Tad) were born in 1846, 1850 and 1853, respectively, and Eddie died in 1850. 

During his circuit riding years, Lincoln was re-elected as a Whig to the Illinois General Assembly in 1840, won a seat in the United States Congress in 1846 where he opposed war with Mexico, became the only future president to earn a U.S. patent for his own invention in 1849, publicly denounced slavery in his 1854 “Peoria Speech,” helped to organize the new Republican party in 1856, spoke against the Dred Scott decision in 1857, and in 1858 ran for a seat in the United States Senate (for which he won the popular vote but lost to Stephen Douglas as a result of gerrymandering and the vote against him taken in the Illinois General Assembly).

Less than two years before he would be elected to the presidency, Mr. Lincoln visited the Woodford County Courthouse in Metamora for the last time, when in 1858, between debates with Judge Stephen Douglas at Charleston and Galesburg and while running for the senate seat from Illinois, he gave a stump speech at Page’s Grove, Metamora, on October 4th that attracted thousands of spectators.  And he completed work on his last case in Woodford County – a case that would prove to be one of his strangest, if not the most notorious of his few criminal cases – a case that would test both the letter and the spirit of the law for Lincoln and others involved.

The following account attempts to patch folklore and various versions of that case into the story of the Melissa Goings murder trial:

Roswell Goings was a seventy-seven year old well-to-do farmer, heavy drinker and known wife beater who lived in Worth Township, Woodford County, Illinois.  Melissa Goings was his seventy-year old wife who alleged that Roswell attacked her and attempted to strangle her in their home on April 14th, 1857.  Melissa later acknowledged that it was necessary for her to use a piece of firewood to defend herself and strike Roswell on the head knocking him unconscious. 

Local legend has it that friends of Roswell attended him that evening and were able to revive him briefly, when he is supposed to have said that Melissa attacked him and struck him about the head several times, saying something about getting the house and farm.  Unfortunately for Roswell, he lapsed back into unconsciousness and died four days later.

 A coroner’s inquest was held, and given the differing accounts, the sheriff, Abiah Minor, had no choice but to arrest Melissa after state’s attorney, Hugh Fullerton, indicted her for first degree murder.  Melissa was then allowed her freedom pending trial after several people – including some of Roswell’s own kin – put up $1,000.00 bail.  The case was continued until the fall session, and the trial date was set for Saturday, October 10th, 1857 before Judge James Harriott.

Lincoln and his co-counsel, Henry Grove, entered the courtroom on the second floor of the Woodford County Courthouse in Metamora, and Lincoln supposedly indicated that he needed more time to prepare his case and get to know his client better; whereupon, Judge Harriott granted a recess.  There are two versions to what happened next – one, that Lincoln and Mrs. Goings walked outside and two, that they sat in a downstairs office to talk privately. 

It is unlikely that Mr. Lincoln was in need of much additional information, but he may have needed some time to deal with the judge’s surprise revocation of Melissa’s bond, which may have alerted him to the judge’s possible predisposition to get the trial over with without much concern for the woman’s defense.  In other words, Melissa was going to be on trial for her life before a possibly unsympathetic judge, as a conviction could result in her being hung.  (From 1800 to 1857, twenty-eight women had been executed by hanging in this country.) 

The town’s folklore is consistent in the telling of this story: Everyone felt sorry for Melissa; for even in a time when wife-beating was tolerated, most thought Roswell took it too far, too often.  The town didn’t want to prosecute Melissa, let alone hang her, and Lincoln had to have been aware of these sentiments.  He may also have been of the opinion that the judge didn’t much care about the town’s sentiments, which may have helped Lincoln, and/or others, seek justice for a victim who might pay with her life for having defended it in the first place from a brutal attacker, her husband.

As her bond had been revoked, technically, Melissa was the responsibility of the sheriff.  At the end of the recess, the courtroom again began to fill up with the officers of the court and the many people who filled the spectator section to enjoy the entertainment that any case would provide – but, to particularly enjoy the entertainment that any case involving Abraham Lincoln, a skilled trial lawyer and his well known practice of throwing in jokes, stories and his country wit, would provide.

Everyone had returned from the recess – everyone, that is, except Melissa Goings, and she was nowhere to be found.  One person is alleged to have said that a foot was seen going through an open window, but no one else could, or would, provide any additional information.  It can be assumed that the judge was not amused.

Again, there appear to be different versions of what happened next.  One version has Lincoln being accused by a bailiff of “running her off,” as Abe was the last one seen with her.  But Lincoln said that he thought the sheriff was watching her after their talk.  The more popular version, though, has Mr. Lincoln responding to the judge’s demand that he approach the bench and explain himself and any part he may have played in his client’s disappearance.

In the commotion of what must have been a confused courtroom, it is said that Lincoln told the judge, “Your honor, I did not chase her off.  She simply asked me where she could get a good drink of water, and I said…Tennessee has mighty fine drinkin’ water.”  Local legend has it that what he said was received with uproarious laughter from a possibly relieved and thoroughly entertained crowd. 

Was it the need to lighten the seriousness of an abruptly truncated murder trial that appeared to be heading in a tragic direction for a woman who survived being beaten down by her husband only to be beaten down again by the letter of the law?  Is it possible that “Honest Abe,” an officer of the court, was in cahoots with those who may have helped old Melissa escape?

Much was muddy, but a few things were clear.  Whatever his part, Lincoln was never sanctioned or held in contempt of court, and there is no evidence that Lincoln had any part in the escape, about which he may have known nothing.  There is a theory that the sheriff and the state’s attorney, bowing to the will of the townspeople, may have turned a blind eye to the shenanigans, so that the spirit of the law, if not the letter, could carry the day for this unfortunate woman – and that Lincoln’s funny line may have been a distraction to take the pressure off the guilty, but noble, parties who chose to risk helping the victimized Mrs. Goings.

The state’s attorney never did sign a warrant for Melissa’s arrest after she escaped – a highly unusual situation.  A year later, October 4th, 1858, when Lincoln returned to Metamora for the last time in the midst of the debates for the Senate seat, he met with the state’s attorney, and Melissa Going’s case of first-degree murder was dismissed!

If Mr. Lincoln had known of the escape plan, was it wrong or courageous or both for him to have played a part in preventing the letter of the law from victimizing the woman another and, perhaps, final time?

Most seem to agree that, regardless of who was responsible for what, October 10th, 1857, both in and outside of court – whether a lackadaisical sheriff, a less than aggressive state’s attorney, a seemingly unmerciful judge, other parties unknown, or a defense attorney very aware of the people’s desire for compassion for this old woman – justice was served.

Would justice have been served if Lincoln had not been involved?  We will likely never know.  There are many who think that Lincoln’s character and behavior as president were, to a large extent, formed while riding the circuit.  He was not perfect then, as he was not always perfect as president; yet, he endures as a hero to most. 

As with many great heroes, he became such by combining courage, cunning and compassion – especially when pursuing an objective for the greater good or for the good of an underdog. 

Lincoln was a keen student of both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.  Of the former, he said, “I have never had a feeling politically that did not spring from the sentiments embodied in the Declaration of Independence.”  In the politically charged atmosphere preceding his run for the Senate, it is hard to imagine that he would have risked his political and legal career by helping a murder defendant run away.

Yet the Declaration is all about the right to throw off the control of a tyrant responsible for abuses that jeopardize one’s security – such as: Melissa’s unclear right to defend her security from the abuses perpetrated by her tyrannical husband.  And if the defendant’s right to defend her security was possibly going to be punished by an unsympathetic judge and an inflexible legal system, then could an interpretation of the Declaration – that if there is something wrong, those who have the ability to take action also have the responsibility to take action – have been far from Lincoln’s mind or the minds of others?

There has been some debate as to whether the Goings murder case, a fairly minor legal footnote in America’s, Illinois’, and for that fact even Woodford County’s legal history, is worthy of, in some way, being cast in bronze for posterity to represent Lincoln’s ties with the Woodford County Courthouse at Metamora – an idea that is now being promoted by the Woodford County Historical Society and others.  It would be far simpler to portray Abe, for instance, at leisure or sitting on a bench or doing something uncomplicated.

No doubt, he enjoyed leisure times and simpler things in Metamora, as he did anywhere else he went.  But, this complicated man with the uncomplicated demeanor, in this writer’s opinion, did not see the law as merely an unchanging monolith to black and white thinking.  When confronted with nearly overwhelming circumstances during the Civil War, did he abide by the letter of the Constitution by: ordering a blockade of rebel ports without a declaration of war, usurping the authority of Congress to build the Union Army and Navy, ordering commanding generals to ignore writs of habeas corpus, including one issued by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court or by declaring martial law and suppressing a free press in New York? 

Lincoln’s presidential actions carried consequences, but were they flawed if all were in an effort to save the Union, which he did?  And where could such ability and determination have been honed, if not in his earlier law practice working the Eighth, taking on just about any case that came his way, thinking on his feet within a system that was not always as compassionate as he.

Lawyer Lincoln’s involvement in the Goings case may have been only to come up with a funny quip to soothe the court during a very awkward moment; there is no evidence to suggest more.  But had he been more involved in Melissa’s disappearance, would it not have been to right a wrong and to keep further wrong from occurring?  Would he not have been, in either light, responding to “the better angels of our nature” – which, is it not in the Melissa Goings situation, just another way to say…justice?
An artistic portrayal of this little slice of Woodford County history is long overdue.  The world-renowned Lincoln-sculptor, John McClarey, has begun preliminary work on this ambitious project.  Let us make it so before the 2008 sesquicentennial of Lincoln’s completion of the case or by the bicentennial of this great man’s birth in 2009.

Metamora’s heritage and history are strongly tied to Abraham Lincoln’s work.  Both he and the village are more than worthy of the recognition that a bronze work of art would bring.

h1

Thoughts on the Wildeness Wal-Mart

August 26, 2009

Google Maps of the Wal-Mart Site

When someone looks at the map of the Wilderness Wal-Mart site from my earlier post on this, one may not see fully the impact that this tract of land will have on the battlefield.  But when you look at it in “real life” from Google Maps, you can see how fully the “empty” ground connects to  the land already part of the Wilderness Battlefield.

The more I sit and think about the Wilderness Wal-Mart, Kevin Levin’s ego, the past and future I am reminded of why I am so captured by history of places like the Wilderness.  I shall let Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain do the talking…

“In great deeds something abides. On great fields something stays. Forms change and pass; bodies disappear, but spirits linger, to consecrate ground for the vision-place of souls. And reverent men and women from afar, and generations that know us not and that we know not of, heart-drawn to see where and by whom great things were suffered and done for them, shall come to this deathless field to ponder and dream; And lo! the shadow of a mighty presence shall wrap them in its bosom, and the power of the vision pass into their souls.”

Speaking at the dedication of the Monument to the 20th Maine
October 3, 1889, Gettysburg, PA

Well, let us hope that when (dare I say IF) the Wilderness Wal-Mart is built that we can still ponder and dream about the brave deeds committed on that ground despite the sound of “jobs, tax revenues and cheap shopping” buzzing all around us.

h1

Wilderness Lost

August 25, 2009

locator-map-with-troops-for-walmart-property-in-relationship-to-wilderness-battlefield

Orange County Supervisors Approve Wal-Mart Superstore on Wilderness Battlefield

County rejects national and local voices urging protection of battleground and National Park

(Orange, Va.) – The Orange County Board of Supervisors today approved a proposal to build 240,000-square feet of big box retail on the Wilderness Battlefield. James Lighthizer, president of the Civil War Preservation Trust (CWPT), issued the following statement in the wake of the vote:

“I am deeply disappointed by today’s vote. The Orange County Board of Supervisors had an opportunity to protect the battlefield by embracing a reasonable compromise approach to the Wal-Mart superstore proposal. Instead, they ignored rational voices on the national, state and local level encouraging them to work with the preservation community and local landowners to find a more suitable alternative location.

“Today’s vote is not just a setback for preservationists. Orange County residents are losers as well. If the county had embraced the preservation planning process first proposed by the Wilderness Battlefield Coalition in January, there would have been an opportunity to mitigate the transportation and development impacts of the proposal. Instead, the board voted to repeat the mistakes made by other localities, who are now struggling to address the problems created by similar piecemeal development and rampant sprawl.

“The ball is now in Wal-Mart’s court. Wal-Mart better understands the nationwide anger generated by its proposal to build on the doorstep of a National Park. It is in the corporation’s best interests to work with the preservation community to find an alternative site. After all, building a big box superstore on the Wilderness Battlefield would belie recent attempts to portray Wal-Mart as environmentally sensitive. We are optimistic that company officials will see the wisdom of moving elsewhere.

“The Civil War Preservation Trust and the other member groups of the Wilderness Battlefield Coalition will now carefully weigh options for continued opposition of this misguided proposal. This battle is not over yet.”

Among those who urged Orange County to chose another location for the proposed Wal-Mart were Senator Jim Webb (D-Va.); Virginia Governor Tim Kaine (D) and House of Delegates Speaker Bill Howell (R); actors Robert Duvall, Richard Dreyfuss and Ben Stein; and more than 250 historians, including Pulitzer prize-winning authors David McCullough and James McPherson and acclaimed documentarian Ken Burns.

Since a Wal-Mart superstore on the Wilderness Battlefield was first publicly announced in June 2008, CWPT has been one of the leading voices against the proposal. Earlier this year, the organization identified the Wilderness Battlefield as one of the most endangered battlefields in the nation because of the Wal-Mart plan. CWPT is a member of the Wilderness Battlefield Coalition.

wilderness-battlefield-title

Picture13

Too bad…the all-mighty-dollar over something that cannot be replaced.

h1

Levin, Casteel, Williams…Oh My!

August 21, 2009

In a recent series of post on both Kevin Levin’s Civil War Memory and Richard Williams’ Old Virginia Blog there as been a great deal discussed and argued over the Casteel statue called “Brothers“.  I will not go into a detailed discussion here, for you can follow the links and read it for yourself, but I must make comments on Williams’ latest post about reconcilation at Gettysburg.  Here is another picture from the same reunion…

5 (2)

It is a picture of blacks whose job it was to pass out blankets to White veterans North and South.  They were not included in the discussion of the war as if the war had nothing to do with their ancestors or their ancestors bondage.  I think Kevin is saying that we have enough memorials or statues to this type of interpretation…we get it…now lets move beyond the typical understanding of the war…one that is in the vacuum of race.  Let us add race into the picture and then we will have a fuller understanding of why there was a Gettysburg and why there was a reunion.

h1

Conundrum: New Confederate Monument or Save Endagered Battlefields?

July 21, 2009

 

My “good friend” Clint Lacy has posted pictures of the recent dedication of the JO Shelby monument in Shelby’s hometown of  Waverly, Mo.  Now the SCV or anyone else has the right to spend their hard earned cash however they want, but I cannot help but think of how much that bronze statue cost and to what real historical end.  On the other hand, the thousands of dollars could have gone to save a real battlefield where men died for what they believed in…whether right or wrong.

But I am sure this Shelby monument has it purpose of pushing the SCV/Neo-Confederate Movement in a new or profound direction under the guise of southern heritage.

Billy

h1

It is All in How You Word It

July 21, 2009

oakwood_plaque

Above is a photo of one of the plaques that greets visitors to Oakwood Cemetery in Richmond, Virginia and is the final resting place of 17,000 confederate soldiers.  It appears that there is some concern over the care of the graves based on the posts over at the Old Virginia Blog.

No, contrary to popular belief, I am all in favor of those graves being protected, preserved and cared for by whom ever is willing to do the job and someone should be responsible for the care of those graves.  But what I have an issue with is the wording of the plaque on the cemetery gates.

The word slain is definedas follows: 1. To kill by violence.  Yes, war is violent.  2. To destroy or extinguish.  Well, they were destroy by the act of participating in the war and therefore their lives were extinguished, but not by purposeful design by the enemy…meaning they died due to the war.  Synonyms are 1. murder, slaughter, massacre, butcher, assassinate. 2.annihilate, ruin.  None of these synonyms apply to the deaths of these soldiers…again, they were soldiers and should have expected, at least, the possibility of death.  So why chose such a word to describe those buried in Oakwood cemetery?  I think it is very clear that the plaque chooses to make a judgment about the way in which the soldiers died and how they should be remembered.

I don’t think any of them need to be remembered as being slain.  They chose to rebel against the legitimate, constitutionally elected government and began a war in the name of slavery and met with the consequences of their actions…just as those who chose to defend the government and died facing the enemy.

Billy

h1

For the SCV, Tips on How Not to Honor the Confederate Flag for the 150th!

July 16, 2009

I have been wondering how the SCV will eventually decide to present their version of the War of the Rebellion during the 150th Anniversary now that they have established a website for informing its members about SCV events.  I stumbled onto the SCV Mechanized Cavalry the other day and spent some time looking at their extensive photo album and I discovered several photos that speak volumes on how NOT to honor the confederate flag.  But since these wonderful southern folks do it…I suppose it is just fine and dandy!  You be the judge!

Biker Shorts!

Ah yes, the biker shorts…nothing like sitting on your heritage…or is it your hate?

Results of riding mini bike with Heritage shorts on...

His mamma should be so proud of him and his heritage!

Grabbing your Heritage junk!

Again, how proud the ancestors must be during a little splash in the pond, one grabs his junk for the camera while sporting a great heritage swimsuit…or are those the biker shorts?…who knows!

Chick hat

Ah, yes…nothing says I am proud of the sacrifices of my ancestors better than a cut up shirt and a rebel flag cowboy hat…busting a pose!

Confederate Pirate

And finally, the Confederate doo rag…Hey look, the confederacy must have been big into pirates…love that puffy shirt!

Maybe southerners should first look at how they honor their ancestors and their beloved flag before they start ripping into the North and Abraham Lincoln during the 150th.  Anyone who reads this blog knows that I am not a big fan of the rebel flag…except in its historical context.  And I know that the American flag makes its way into many a clothing item as well.  But for those who have websites and committees established for the direct concern of heritage violations, one would think they would have more respect.

Billy Yank!

h1

Lincoln and Memory

February 2, 2009

lincoln

I had the opportunity over this past weekend to visit the Abraham Lincoln Presidential Museum and Library in Springfield as a guest of State Farm and WNET out of New York in order to preview “Looking For Lincoln”… an new documentary from PBS that will air on Feburary 11th.  On friday night we were treated to a talk by Philip Kunhardt III on the companion book of the same name that he and his brother and nephew along the same lines as the new documentary.  During the dicussion that preceeded the talk by Mr. Kunhardt, we were told by the producer of the documentary that the movie and the book do not follow each other exactly, for the movie was supposed to be four hours but they only received funding for two hours.

Mr. Kunhardt then gave a short talk on Lincoln and Memory and how Lincoln’s myth is more understood today than the real man.  Following his talk was a short (15 minute) segment of the movie which dealt with several of the topics in the entire movie.  I was supprised to see two very unexpected parts, one interview with Lerone Bennett who said that all he ever believed about Lincoln was a lie.  Any student of slavery and the Civil War will know that Lerone Bennett was the author of “Foreced Into Glory: Abraham Lincoln’s White Dream”, which makes the case that Lincoln was really a white supremicist.  The other scene that surprised me was the creator of the documentary, whose journey you follow to find Lincoln, Henry Louis Gates attends the 2008 Sons of Confederate Veterans Annual Convention where they honored Weary Clyburn as a black confederate.   If you watch this movie on Feb. 11th, you will have to be the judge as to how you think the Clyburn family looked and felt with this “distinct honor” bestowed upon them by the SCV.

The next day the teachers that had attened the “premier” the previous night joined WNET and State Farm for a educational seminar at the Lincoln Presidential Library to learn how  to use the companion website and the lesson plans for our classrooms.  To be honest this was more helpful and more applicable to my teaching than the previous night for obvious reasons, but it also helped that during the three our seminar we were able to see more of the documentary.  I did recieve the entire DVD as I left the museum on friday night but was not able to watch it in my hotel room for lack of a DVD player.  After the seminar I had the chance to visit the museum fully and hit the gift shop.  There I parted with $50 of my hard earn teacher’s pay and bought the companion book…and I am glad I did.

On monday I was able to set down and finally watch the entire two hour documentary and look through the companion book and I must say the documenaty needed four hours to finish its discussion of the topics it presented.  For example, there is the discussion between Gates and Bennett where Bennett says everything he learned about Lincol was a lie…and that is it…no further fleshing out of that idea or argument.  The book goes much deeper into why and how the myth of Lincoln developed after his death up until the death of Robet Todd Lincoln in 1926.

All in all the the experience was a great one.  I really enjoyed being invited to take part in something connected to the Lincoln 200th Birthday and to visit the ALPLM.  I look forward to trying out some of the lessons associated with the documentary and I really look forward to reading more of the companion book.

h1

Brag Bowling Brags!

August 15, 2008
Old Brag and Davis

Old Brag and Davis

Well, it may not really be bragging, but in the video seen HERE, Brag Bowling of the Virginia Sons of Confederate Veterans says he looks forward to working with the American Civil War Center at Tredegar in the placement and interpretation of the Davis statue that has been accepted by the center. 

Now from watching the video, I did not get a sense that the center at Tredegar was all that set on working with Brag Bowling or the SCV on the placement of the statue.  Does Brag’s statement mean the statue donation is still on?  We shall see.

h1

Davis Statue Accepted

August 13, 2008

Today the American Civil War Center at the Tredegar site in downtown Richmond, Va. accepted a statue of Jefferson Davis, his son and Jim Limber-a “resuced” black child “adopted” by the Davis family.  The decision came a few years after a statue of President Abraham Lincoln and his son Tad were placed at the Tredegar site despite opposition by Neo-Confederate groups and the SCV.

Today’s decision is not set in stone, the company that owns the site will still need to approve of this new accusation.  The center also said that they would decide where, when and how it will be displayed. 

If the Center has any sense at all it will use the statue to further the discussion of the three parts of the story there…including the one that deals with the cause of the war…Slavery.  To say I am dissappointed is an understatment, but hopefully the center will use the statue in a way to further the understanding of the position of the south in terms of slavery.  Maybe someone could donate a statue of the V.P. Stevens with his quote about slavery being the “Conerstone” of the Confederacy.

Anyone good at sculpting and who wants to start taking up a collection?

 

Billy Yank